Current:Home > MyStanding Rock Tribe Prepares Legal Fight as Dakota Oil Pipeline Gets Final Approval -MacroWatch
Standing Rock Tribe Prepares Legal Fight as Dakota Oil Pipeline Gets Final Approval
View
Date:2025-04-15 13:46:10
This story was updated Feb. 9
The Army Corps of Engineers granted a final easement for the Dakota Access oil pipeline late Wednesday. The action overturned an earlier ruling by the Army Corps to halt construction until it conducted a more complete environmental assessment of the project’s Missouri River crossing.
The Standing Rock Sioux tribe, whose reservation is a half-mile downstream from the crossing, says the pipeline threatens its water supply and sacred sites. Its opposition triggered months of protests. An environmental impact review initiated by the Army Corps in the final weeks of the Obama administration could have delayed the project for years. That review is now canceled. The move follows a Jan. 24 memorandum by President Donald Trump that ordered the Army Corps to expedite the approval.
“Today’s announcement will allow for the final step, which is granting of the easement,” Robert Speer, acting secretary of the Army, said on Tuesday when the Army Corps notified Congress the easement would be granted. “Once that it done, we will have completed all the tasks in the Presidential Memorandum of January 24, 2017.”
The mile-and-a-half river crossing is the final easement needed to finish the 1,172 mile pipeline, which would connect the Bakken oil fields of North Dakota to an existing crude oil terminal near Pakota, Illinois.
In a letter sent on Tuesday to Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Az.) of Arizona, ranking member of the House Committee on Natural Resources, the Army Corps said it would issue an easement for the Missouri River crossing in as little as 24 hours. The agency waived its policy of waiting 14 days after notifying Congress before granting the easement.
Grijalva sharply criticized the Trump administration’s decision.
“In his first few weeks in office our new president has built a resume of discrimination, falsehoods, and sloppy work, and now the decision to trample the sovereignty of our First Americans is the latest entry on a growing list of shameful actions,” he said.
Sally Jewell, Interior secretary under President Obama who was involved in the decision to halt the pipeline, said the Army Corps is “reneging” on its commitments to other federal agencies and to the tribe after promising a full environmental review before granting the pipeline’s easement.
The Standing Rock Sioux tribe will file litigation against the Army Corps within days, according to Phillip Ellis, a spokesperson for Earthjustice, an environmental law firm that is representing the tribe.
“We are a sovereign nation and we will fight to protect our water and sacred places from the brazen private interests trying to push this pipeline through to benefit a few wealthy Americans with financial ties to the Trump administration,” said Dave Archambault II, chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe. “Americans have come together in support of the Tribe asking for a fair, balanced and lawful pipeline process. The environmental impact statement was wrongfully terminated.”
The tribe could also request a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order to immediately halt construction beneath the Missouri River, environmental law experts said. Winning such an injunction, however, would likely prove difficult. The tribe would have to show that construction itself, and not a potential spill after the pipeline began transporting oil, would cause irreparable harm.
The pipeline could be completed and begin transporting oil within 83 days, officials with Energy Transfer Partners, the company building the pipeline, said. The project is more than 90 percent complete.
Legal experts disagreed on the tribe’s likelihood of success in challenging the Army Corps’ decision with some saying the Corps is on “solid legal ground.”
Others said the Corps’ about-face immediately after Trump’s inauguration with little explanation other than the President’s memorandum would make the easement difficult to uphold.
“If I were going to maximize the chances that a court would invalidate the decision you would do what the Army Corps did here and provide no explanation for changing your mind.” said Keith Benes, a former state department lawyer that managed the environmental review for the Keystone XL pipeline.
“Its extraordinary because the Army Corps just before President Trump’s inauguration issued a letter of intent to do the full environmental impact statement,” said Sarah Krakoff, a Native American law professor at the University of Colorado Law School. “From a legal standpoint it’s hard to understand the change of decision as one that is rooted in deliberation and consideration of the legal requirements.”
Benes said the court wouldn’t necessarily rule that the Army Corps can’t grant the easement without conducting a full environmental review but that the Corps might need to provide better reasons for why it was canceled.
Meanwhile, industry groups applauded the decision.
“By moving forward with this critical infrastructure project, President Trump is fulfilling the commitment he made to the American people to build out the necessary infrastructure to unleash the vast potential of America’s energy resources,” Chet Thompson, president and CEO of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, said.
“The days of slow-walking and obstructing pipeline projects are clearly over,” said Thomas Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, a conservative nonprofit. “Today, the Army Corps of Engineers did what it should have done months ago by approving a pipeline that went through a lawful environmental and cultural review.”
Pipeline opponents said they will continue to fight.
“The granting of an easement, without any environmental review or tribal consultation, is not the end of this fight—it is the new beginning,” Tom Goldtooth, executive director of the Indigenous Environmental Network, said. “Expect mass resistance far beyond what Trump has seen so far.”
A couple thousand people, including groups of military veterans, are coming back to Standing Rock to protest the planned construction, former Congressional candidate and Standing Rock Sioux tribe member Chase Iron Eyes said on Tuesday.
ICN reporter Zahra Hirji contributed reporting.
veryGood! (4287)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- As war in Gaza tests interfaith bonds in the US, some find ways to mend relationships
- Caitlin Clark of Iowa is the AP Player of the Year in women’s hoops for the 2nd straight season
- California schools forced to compete with fast food industry for workers after minimum wage hike
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Chiefs' Rashee Rice apologizes for role in hit-and-run, takes 'full responsibility'
- Wolf kills calf in Colorado in first confirmed depredation since animals' reintroduction
- LSU star Angel Reese declares for WNBA draft
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- New rule strengthening federal job protections could counter Trump promises to remake the government
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- NASA probes whether object that crashed into Florida home came from space station
- Where have you been? A California dog missing since the summer is found in Michigan
- Kansas City fans claim power back by rejecting Chiefs and Royals stadium tax
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Audit finds flaws -- and undelivered mail -- at Postal Service’s new processing facility in Virginia
- Solar eclipse cloud forecast means anxiety for totality tourists hoping for clear skies
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Gone Fishing
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
Kiss sells catalog, brand name and IP. Gene Simmons assures fans it is a ‘collaboration’
Texas asks court to decide if the state’s migrant arrest law went too far
When does 'Scoop' come out? Release date, cast, where to watch movie about Prince Andrew BBC interview
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Nick Cannon says he feels obligated to 'defend' Sean 'Diddy' Combs in resurfaced interview
Caitlin Clark picks up second straight national player of the year award
Tiger Woods' ankle has 'zero mobility,' Notah Begay says before the Masters