Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -MacroWatch
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-14 21:46:48
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (57685)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Chiefs begin NFL title defense against Lions on Thursday night at Arrowhead Stadium
- This meteorite is 4.6 billion years old. Here's what it could reveal about Earth's creation
- Lainey Wilson leads the 2023 Country Music Award nominations for the second year in a row
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Investigators say a blocked radio transmission led to a June close call between planes in San Diego
- In Southeast Asia, Harris says ‘we have to see the future’
- Japan’s Kishida says China seafood ban contrasts with wide support for Fukushima water release
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Influencer mom charged with felony child abuse after son's alleged escape
Ranking
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Dozens of migrants rescued off Greek island of Lesbos. Search is under way for woman feared missing
- Some pendants, rings and gold pearls. Norwegian archaeologists say it’s the gold find of the century
- First offer from General Motors falls short of demands by the United Auto Workers, but it’s a start
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Extreme heat is cutting into recess for kids. Experts say that's a problem
- Grammy Museum to launch 50 years of hip-hop exhibit featuring artifacts from Tupac, Biggie
- Top workplaces: Here's your chance to be deemed one of the top workplaces in the U.S.
Recommendation
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
High school football coach at center of Supreme Court prayer case resigns after first game back
Russian missile strike kills 17 at Ukraine market as Blinken visits to show support, offer more U.S. help
Narcissists have a type. Are you a narcissist magnet? Here's how to tell.
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Kendra Wilkinson admitted to emergency room for reported panic attack
Prince Harry Returns to London for WellChild Awards Ahead of Queen Elizabeth II's Death Anniversary
As U.S. warns North Korea against giving Russia weapons for Ukraine, what could Kim Jong Un get in return?